Seattle tells Facebook violated a political advertising law

as mentioned in The issue began final December, the time Seattle newspaper The Stranger attempted to request 2017 state election advertisement information from Facebook. The document lists candidate names, their Facebook page names, Facebook page addresses, total spend, service provided, and manner of payment. The crisis is which a lot of the information Facebook provided seems limited, and it doesn't match with the disclosure filings from the candidates themselves. Facebook's disclosures about political advertesment on the platform have been under scrutiny over the past year, prompting CEO check mark Zuckerberg to draft a new outline regarding untraceable ads. That would require companies like Facebook to save copies of political advertesment and make information about them publicly available, in the same vein as political advertesment on other mediums, like television.

Seattle tells Facebook has violated a 1977 political advertising law

Seattle, Washington, has taken the issue of who pays for political advertesment on Facebook into its own hands. Seattle's effort seems to be the premier native attempt to regulate on-line political advertesment in the US, according to Reuters. Seattle's law tells anyone selling advertising in native elections has to discover "the exact nature and extent of the advertising services rendered," involving payment amounts and methods. "Facebook is a powerful supporter of transparency in political advertising," told going to Castleberry, Facebook's vice president for state and native public policy, in a statement sent to Quartz. Lawmakers in Washington have suggested the fair advertesment Act, that would regulate on-line political advertising on a Fed level.

Seattle tells Facebook violated a political advertising law

as mentioned in Seattle is facing off versus Facebook and other tech companies over a 1977 campaign finance law–and if the town succeeds, they may become the premier town to regulate on-line political advertesment in the U.S. The face-off started thanks to the reportage of everyone's favorite native paper, The Stranger. Back in December, the paper explained how the city's mayoral candidates spent tens of thousands of dollars on Facebook and Google ads, however there was no record of what these advertesment looked like or whom they were targeting, as required with Seattle law. Specifically, the law tells which anyone selling advertising in native elections has to discover "the exact nature and extent of the advertising services rendered," on radio, TV, billboards, brochures, and, according to the city's interpretation of the law, the internet. The Stranger wanted to realize why Google, Facebook, and Twitter weren't complying with the law.

collected by :Roy Mark